Trump–Xi summit delivers a triple win

The recent summit between the Chinese and US leaders in Beijing may mark the most significant recalibration in bilateral relations since the US–China trade war began in 2018. Over the past eight years, ties have been defined by trade disputes, technology restrictions, supply chain decoupling, and intensifying geopolitical rivalry. At times, the relationship has edged close to confrontation and broader strategic instability.

However, signals emerging from the summit suggest that both sides are now attempting to shift from a confrontational relationship toward a new phase of managed competition and pragmatic cooperation.

From a broader perspective, the summit produced a sort of “win-win” outcome.

China attached greater importance to the strategic results of the meeting, especially the establishment of a more constructive and stable framework for bilateral relations. For China, the achievement of national rejuvenation and modernisation depends heavily on a stable external environment. China’s rapid growth over the past four decades benefited greatly from a relatively peaceful and stable international order.

However, since the US launched the trade war against China in 2018, China has faced increasing pressure from the US and some Western countries in areas such as trade, technology, finance, and geopolitics. External uncertainty has gradually become one of the biggest risks to China’s long-term development.

For this reason, in recent years, China has adopted a dual approach, responding firmly to US pressure through countermeasures, technological self-reliance, and stabilising its domestic economy, while consistently trying to bring bilateral relations back to a rational, communicative, and non-confrontational track. China’s objective has never been confrontation for its own sake, but rather stability through strategic resilience.

At this summit, the US largely accepted the direction of building a relatively stable framework for bilateral ties. Although this adjustment may have been partly driven by circumstances, it also serves America’s current interests.

For years, a key logic behind Washington’s China policy was the belief that strong pressure could slow or contain China’s rise. Yet eight years of strategic competition have shown that China has not been weakened, but has demonstrated considerable resilience in industrial upgrading, technological development, and global influence. The US is gradually realising that China is not a country that can simply be “suppressed”, but rather a major power that must be engaged on the basis of long-term coexistence and relative equality.

At the same time, while China has continued to resist US pressure, it has also shown restraint and rationality. Beijing has not chosen full-scale confrontation, but has continued to respond to US concerns, maintain communication channels, and express willingness for cooperation. China hopes to manage differences through dialogue rather than escalation, which has increasingly convinced Washington that China is a rational and negotiable strategic competitor, rather than a completely uncontrollable challenger.

More importantly, the US is currently facing growing external and internal pressures. The continuing Russia-Ukraine conflict and tensions surrounding Iran have forced Washington to reconsider how it allocates its global strategic resources. Under such circumstances, the US has strong reasons to avoid simultaneous strategic confrontations on multiple fronts. As a result, it has become more important to stabilise relations with China.

Meanwhile, instability in the Middle East has created economic pressure for the US. Energy price fluctuations and supply chain disruptions have added to inflationary pressures at home. These developments directly affect public support for the Trump administration and could influence the Republican Party’s performance in future midterm elections. Therefore, the US leadership needs short-term economic achievements to ease domestic pressure.

From this perspective, Trump’s cooperative posture at the summit also reflected practical political calculations. China’s expanded purchases of US agricultural products and Boeing aircraft can help improve economic expectations in the US, while allowing Trump to present the summit as a diplomatic success to domestic audiences. In this sense, the US focuses more on short-term economic gains, while China places greater emphasis on long-term strategic stability, creating complementary interests between the two sides.

More importantly, the summit was not only a “win-win” outcome for China and the US. To some extent, it was a “triple win”, as the global economy also benefited.

Over the past several years, one of the greatest risks to the global economy has been the uncertainty created by worsening China-US relations. Supply chain disruptions, technology restrictions, financial risks, and geopolitical tensions have kept the world economy under pressure. Many smaller and medium-sized countries have also found themselves increasingly forced to choose sides between China and the US, limiting their own strategic and economic flexibility.

The stabilising signals from this summit therefore help improve global expectations, as signs of easing tensions in areas such as semiconductors and rare earth supplies could contribute to greater stability in global supply chains, while some degree of consensus between China and the US on maintaining freedom of navigation along major international sea routes may help prevent key waterways from becoming further weaponised. All these developments could reduce uncertainty in the global economy.

Today, the world’s greatest challenge is not simply conflict between individual countries, but the broader problem of instability, unpredictability, and uncertainty. As the world’s two largest economies, China and the US have a responsibility to provide greater stability for the international system.

Of course, we must also recognise that the structural complexities in China-US relations have not fundamentally disappeared. Deep differences in ideology, development models, technological competition, and geopolitical interests still exist between both countries. Future tensions and fluctuations remain possible, and long-term stability is far from guaranteed.

Even so, this summit remains highly significant. It suggests that China-US relations may gradually be shifting away from decoupling and confrontation toward a framework of competition with cooperation; away from zero-sum rivalry toward strategic manageability; and away from the dangerous edge of the Thucydides Trap toward a more rational form of interaction.

Competition between major powers may be inevitable, but it should not evolve into political hostility or strategic confrontation. Differences can exist, but they must be managed through effective mechanisms.

Looking ahead, the future of China-US relations will depend largely on three factors. First, the practical needs of global governance. Challenges such as artificial intelligence governance, climate change, energy security, and global financial stability all require cooperation between the world’s two largest powers.

Second, the domestic development conditions within both countries. Foreign policy ultimately reflects domestic realities, and stable, rational domestic development will continue to shape bilateral relations.

Third, the degree to which the two economies and industrial systems can develop deeper forms of complementarity and shared interests. Only stronger mutual interests can create a truly stable long-term relationship.

The world is now standing at a new crossroads. This summit may not mean that China and the US have entered a permanently stable era. But it does represent a new beginning. And in today’s uncertain world, such a beginning already carries important value.

Related: Trump in Beijing: Why even limited success is remarkable | Trump-Xi summit delivers deals — and exposes fault lines