Beyond Elon Musk: Who benefits from the trillionaire era?

(Edited and refined by Josephine Hong, with the assistance of AI translation.)

In June, global capital markets hit a symbolic milestone. Space technology company SpaceX completed the largest initial public offering (IPO) in history, with its market value briefly surging past US$2 trillion. Consequently, founder Elon Musk’s personal net worth crossed the US$1 trillion threshold, making him the first trillionaire in history. 

This is more than just financial news; it reads like a manifesto for a new era. From the steel magnates of the Industrial Revolution and the tech barons of the internet age, to today’s entrepreneurs who command rockets, satellites, artificial intelligence (AI) and electric vehicles (EVs), wealth is concentrating in the hands of a few at an unprecedented pace.

Wealth amplified

Musk has undoubtedly changed the world. He propelled EVs from a niche market into the mainstream, turned reusable rockets from science fiction into a commercial reality, and built a satellite network that connected remote regions to the global communication system. In terms of human civilisation’s progress, he has driven innovations that governments either could not achieve or were unwilling to fund. 

By drastically reducing launch costs, SpaceX has redefined the rules of engagement for the global aerospace industry — achievements that could never have been realised through mere capital market speculation.

Yet, a counter-perspective deserves equal attention: has Musk truly created US$1 trillion worth of societal value? Or rather, is it even possible for any individual to contribute so monumentally to humanity as to warrant a personal fortune that eclipses the GDP of many nations?

The answer is not as straightforward. The net worth bestowed by the market does not equate to liquid cash; rather, it reflects investor expectations for the future. The exponential surge in Musk’s wealth stems largely from the capital market’s faith in his capacity to engineer an even grander future. In other words, this is a valuation of tomorrow, not a settlement of today. Investors are willing to pay a premium for SpaceX shares not simply because it launches rockets, but because they believe it could control the future space economy, global communication networks, AI infrastructure, and eventually, the colonisation of Mars.

The underlying issue is that capital market expectations often have a magnifying effect. An exceptional teacher might change the lives of thousands of students, a doctor might save countless patients, and a scientist might discover a cure for a disease — yet their incomes will never grow exponentially. Technology companies are different.

Digital products have the unique property of near-zero marginal cost replication; a single software programme can serve billions of users, and a satellite system can cover the globe. Consequently, the tech industry inherently skews towards a “winner-takes-all” dynamic. In the past, an entrepreneur aspiring to become the world’s richest person had to build factories across numerous cities. Today, a tech entrepreneur needs only to master algorithms, platforms and network effects to capture the global market. This is the fundamental catalyst behind the explosive growth of modern tech wealth.

Therefore, asking whether Musk deserves a US$1 trillion fortune misses the mark. The real question is whether modern economic systems should allow an individual to infinitely amplify value creation and wealth accumulation through the sheer leverage of technology.

Squeeze on middle class

Over the past decade, the wealth of global tech giants has grown at a pace that far outstrips average wage growth — a trend accelerated by AI. By leveraging AI systems, just one top engineer can now accomplish work that previously required dozens of people. A company that commands large models can serve hundreds of millions of users globally. While these productivity gains are exhilarating, the distribution of wealth has failed to keep pace.

Although the Industrial Revolution widened the wealth gap, factories required massive labour forces, ultimately generating vast employment opportunities. The AI revolution, however, may unfold differently: corporate output increases while headcount decreases. As profits concentrate in the hands of capital and technology owners, the role of the middle class is squeezed. This is the most concerning reality behind the birth of the trillionaire.

If the future sees only a handful of corporations controlling AI platforms, satellite networks, semiconductor computing power and global databases, the efficiency gains brought about by technology will not be equitably distributed. Humanity may become vastly wealthier, but it risks becoming profoundly more unequal.

Mechanism for shared prosperity

Even so, we cannot discount technological innovation. Without entrepreneurs willing to shoulder immense risks, many breakthroughs would never materialise. The internet, smartphones and cloud services became ubiquitous only because a select few poured massive resources into them. The issue is not whether figures like Musk should exist, but rather how society can ensure that the fruits of innovation are more broadly shared.

The critical challenge ahead is not to stifle technological advancement, but to establish new distribution mechanisms. Education systems must evolve to equip more people with the skills to use AI, and tax structures must be redesigned to reflect the realities of the digital economy. Governments must foster innovation while preventing the excessive concentration of market power. Otherwise, as technology advances, the public sense of equity will only continue to erode.

Musk becoming the world’s first trillionaire may well be a major milestone in the history of human technological development. Yet, the most memorable aspect is not the number of zeros the figure contains, but its stark reminder that technology alone cannot deliver social equity. 

Technology can launch rockets into space and propel wealth to unprecedented heights. Yet the ultimate test of human intelligence is not whether we can create the next trillionaire, but whether we can ensure that the prosperity generated by technology is not concentrated in the hands of a privileged few at the apex of society. Instead, it must become a shared harvest for society as a whole. This is the defining question of the trillionaire era.

This article was first published in Lianhe Zaobao as “兆元富豪的诞生与科技时代公平问题”.

Related: What SpaceX’s IPO means for China | China satellite investment soars as SpaceX sparks race for piece of the sky