How geopolitics rewired China’s economy

For much of the past few years, international discussion about China’s economy has centred on a familiar list of concerns: a prolonged property downturn, weak consumer confidence and slowing growth. These challenges are real, but they do not tell the whole story. The first half of 2026 points to another, less noticed development — China’s economy is undergoing a structural transformation that may prove more significant than the pace of its short-term recovery.

The evidence is increasingly visible. During the first five months of 2026, China’s manufacturing sector recorded its strongest quarterly performance since late 2020. The official Purchasing Managers’ Index returned to expansion territory, industrial profits recovered strongly, and both production and new orders continued to improve. Exports of goods and services grew at double-digit rates, while high-value manufactured products and knowledge-intensive services became major drivers of external demand. By contrast, the property sector remained under adjustment and household consumption recovered only gradually.

Technology, geopolitics and industrial policy intertwined

Taken together, these indicators suggest that China’s economy is becoming more production-driven, technology-intensive and export-oriented than in previous growth cycles.

This shift deserves attention not only because of its implications for China, but also because it reflects broader changes in the global economy.

Around the world, industrial policy has returned to the centre of economic strategy. The US is making strenuous efforts to push ahead with reindustrialisation. The EU has accelerated its green industrial transition. Japan has revived its semiconductor sector after decades of decline, while South Korea continues to expand investment in advanced technologies. Economic efficiency remains important, but governments increasingly place equal emphasis on technological capability, supply chain resilience and national security.

Against this backdrop, China’s transformation appears less exceptional than many assume. It is part of a broader reorganisation of global production in which technology, geopolitics and industrial policy have become increasingly intertwined.

One important force behind this transformation has been the prolonged strategic rivalry between China and the US.

Over the past several years, Washington has imposed increasingly stringent export controls on advanced semiconductors, manufacturing equipment and selected critical technologies. These measures were intended to slow China’s technological progress in strategically important industries.

Yet economic history often produces unintended consequences.

Prizing high-technology sectors

External pressure frequently accelerates domestic adjustment. Japan moved rapidly into higher-value manufacturing after the oil shocks of the 1970s. South Korea strengthened technological upgrading following the Asian financial crisis. In different historical contexts, external constraints became catalysts for structural change rather than simply obstacles to growth.

China appears to be following a similar — though much larger — trajectory.

Facing tighter technology restrictions, Beijing has channelled increasing financial resources towards semiconductor manufacturing, artificial intelligence, advanced equipment, renewable energy and digital industries. Private investment has also shifted in the same direction as firms seek to strengthen their technological capabilities in a more uncertain international environment.

As a result, high-technology manufacturing has become one of the most dynamic parts of China’s industrial economy. Increasingly, growth comes from sectors that depend on innovation, engineering capability and sophisticated supply chains rather than low-cost labour alone.

Perhaps the clearest evidence can be found in China’s exports.

Two decades ago, China’s export success depended largely on consumer goods such as garments, furniture and household appliances. Today, export growth is increasingly driven by machinery, industrial equipment, battery storage systems, electronic components and products linked to artificial intelligence and digital technologies.

This transformation reflects changes not only within China but also in global demand.

The world is currently experiencing two parallel industrial transitions.

Across much of the Global South, countries continue to expand infrastructure, manufacturing capacity and urban development. Their demand for electricity networks, industrial machinery, transportation equipment and energy systems continues to grow rapidly.

At the same time, advanced economies are entering a new phase of reindustrialisation. Massive investment in artificial intelligence, data centres, renewable energy and advanced manufacturing is creating rising demand for semiconductors, industrial automation, power equipment and sophisticated intermediate goods.

Changing China’s comparative advantage

Although these economies are at different stages of development, both are generating demand for capital goods rather than traditional consumer products.

This changing pattern of global demand has reshaped China’s comparative advantage.

Export destinations have evolved as well.

Trade with ASEAN, the Middle East and other emerging economies has expanded steadily, reducing dependence on any single market and strengthening resilience against geopolitical uncertainty. At the same time, exports to advanced economies remain substantial, particularly in products associated with industrial upgrading and the global energy transition.

Taken together, these developments suggest that China’s recent export performance is not simply the result of cyclical recovery. It reflects a broader restructuring of industrial capabilities, export composition and international markets. Ironically, strategic competition has helped accelerate some of the very structural changes that it originally sought to constrain.

Stabilisation of US-China ties boosts investor confidence

Yet geopolitics alone cannot explain China’s economic performance in 2026.

If strategic rivalry has helped reshape China’s industrial structure, a second and seemingly contradictory development has also played a role: the gradual stabilisation of relations between China and the US over the past year.

Strategic competition remains the defining feature of the relationship. Differences over technology, national security, trade and industrial policy are unlikely to disappear anytime soon. Nevertheless, a series of high-level meetings between senior officials from both countries, culminating in the leaders’ summit in Beijing in May, has signalled a shared interest in managing competition rather than allowing it to spiral into confrontation.

This distinction matters economically.

For businesses, competition is often manageable; unpredictability is not. Companies can adapt to tariffs, regulations and changing market conditions. What they find far more difficult to navigate is the possibility of sudden policy shifts, escalating restrictions or disruptions to global supply chains.

In this respect, the recent improvement in bilateral communication has helped reduce some of the uncertainty that weighed on business sentiment in previous years. It has not removed geopolitical risks, nor has it ended strategic competition. But it has provided investors with more confidence that economic disputes can be managed within a more predictable framework.

This emerging condition may best be described as managed strategic competition — a relationship in which rivalry remains intense, yet both sides recognise the costs of uncontrolled escalation.

As the world’s two largest economies, China and the US remain deeply embedded in global trade, finance and technology networks. Reduced uncertainty surrounding bilateral relations helps foster a more stable external environment for multinational corporations, global supply chains and cross-border capital flows. At a time when geopolitical tensions remain elevated across many regions, even modest improvements in strategic stability can have outsized economic effects.

This does not mean that China’s economic transition is without challenges.

The property sector continues to search for a new equilibrium after years of debt-fuelled expansion. Many small and medium-sized enterprises still face significant financial pressure. Household consumption, while improving, has lagged behind the recovery in manufacturing and exports. The benefits generated by high-technology industries have yet to spread fully across the broader economy.

These challenges point to a growing structural divide.

On one side are sectors linked to advanced manufacturing, digital technologies, artificial intelligence and renewable energy. On the other are traditional industries, smaller businesses and households that have not benefited equally from the gains generated by technological upgrading.

Innovation dividends should be shared

Such divergence is not unique to China. Similar patterns have appeared during previous periods of major technological change. Productivity improvements often emerge first in production and investment before gradually translating into stronger wages, broader employment opportunities and higher household spending.

The same may be true in the age of artificial intelligence.

New technologies can increase productivity and create entirely new industries, but their broader economic benefits take time to diffuse. The challenge for policymakers is therefore not only to encourage innovation but also to ensure that its gains are widely shared.

For decades, China’s rise was powered by urbanisation, infrastructure investment, property development and the export of labour-intensive consumer goods. Those engines have not disappeared entirely, but they are no longer the sole drivers of economic expansion. Increasingly, growth is being shaped by innovation, advanced manufacturing, productivity gains and higher value-added exports.

Viewed from this perspective, the significance of China’s economic performance in the first half of 2026 lies less in the headline growth numbers than in the changing nature of growth itself.

Related: China as an absolute advantage economy | ‘We’re not that wealthy’: Beijing’s answer to China Shock 2.0